Humoral and cellular immune response after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 messenger ribonucleic acid vaccination in heart transplant recipients: An observational study in France.

Introduction: Heart transplant (HT) recipients have a high risk of developing severe COVID-19. Immunoglobulin G antibodies are considered to provide protective immunity and T-cell activity is thought to confer protection from severe disease. However, data on T-cell response to mRNA vaccination in a context of HT remains limited. Methods: In 96 HT patients, a IFN-γ release assay and an anti-Spike antibody test were used to evaluate the ability of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines to generate cellular and humoral immune response. Blood samples were collected few weeks to 7 months after vaccination. Multiple fractional polynomial and LASSO regression models were used to define predictors of T-cell response. Results: Three to five months after vaccination, three doses of vaccine induced a positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response in 47% of recipients and a positive humoral response in 83% of recipients, 11.1% of patients remained negative for both T and B cell responses. Three doses were necessary to reach high IgG response levels (>590 BAU/mL), which were obtained in a third of patients. Immunity was greatly amplified in the group who had three vaccine doses plus COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Our study revealed that T and B immunity decreases over time, leading us to suggest the interest of a booster vaccination at 5 months after the third dose. Moreover, a close follow-up of immune response following vaccination is needed to ensure ongoing immune protection. We also found that significant predictors of higher cellular response were infection and active smoking, regardless of immunosuppressive treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of prosthetic joint infections according to time of occurrence, a 10-year study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the microorganisms responsible for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and their antimicrobial susceptibilities, and to propose appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatments (EATs) according to time of occurrence METHODS: This 10-year retrospective study presents the bacterial etiology of 282 consecutive PJIs in a French hospital according to time of occurrence (adapted from Zimmerli's classification: early, <3 months; delayed, 3-12 months; late acute, >12 months with hematogenous seeding or contiguous spread; late chronic, >12 months without hematogenous seeding). The expected efficacy of various EATs was analyzed for each PJI. RESULTS: Staphylococci were the most commonly found bacteria (S. aureus (44.3%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (25.2%) with 15.2% and 49.3% methicillin resistance, respectively), followed by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (17.7%) and streptococci (14.9%). The distribution of species varied between categories, but antibiotics targeting GNBs were required in all categories. Imipenem-vancomycin was the most effective combination (99.3%) but should be reserved for patients with suspected resistant GNB. Cefotaxime-vancomycin was less effective in early/delayed and late PJIs (91.1% and 86.1%, respectively), due to resistant GNB and polymicrobial infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam-vancomycin appeared to be appropriate in all situations (>96% efficacy). CONCLUSION: Proposing universal recommendations remains challenging, but a good understanding of the local epidemiology is important for optimizing EATs.

Beyond QuantiFERON-TB Results, the Added Value of a Weak Mitogen Response.

Introduction: While QuantiFERON-TB gold (QFT) is frequently used, little attention is paid to the mitogen response. How it could be impacted and associated with outcomes is poorly known. Methods: Retrospective, case-control study in hospitalized patients who underwent QFT testing in two hospitals between 2016 and 2019. We defined two groups of cases with either negative [interferon (IFN)-γ ≤ 0.5 IU/ml, official threshold] or weak (0.5-2 IU/ml) mitogen response, and one group of controls with normal (>2 IU/ml) mitogen response. Results: A total of 872 patients were included. An ongoing infection was independently associated with both a negative (RR = 4.34; 95% CI = 2.94-6.41) and a weak mitogen response (RR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.66-3.58). Among tuberculosis patients, a weak mitogen response was associated with a false-negative QFT result (75%) compared to a normal response (20%). Decreasing mitogen response (normal, weak and negative, respectively) was associated with increasing length of hospital stay [median (interquartile range) 5 (3-13), 11 (5-21) and 15 (10-30) days; p < 0.001] and increasing hospital mortality (3, 7, and 15%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Clinicians should take notice of the mitogen response since IFN-γ concentrations lower than <2 IU/ml were associated with false-negative QFT results in tuberculosis patients, independently associated with ongoing infections, and could be associated with worse prognosis.